ParkerVision, Inc. has filed a petition for writ of certiorari, docketed on Thursday, November 7, with the United States Supreme Court, presenting the question of whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s (CAFC’s) habit of issuing one-word affirmances under Rule 36(a) is prohibited under 35 U.S.C. § 144. The underlying cases stem from appeals of two Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decisions in which the Board invalidated all challenged claims of ParkerVision’s U.S. Patent Nos. 7,292,835 and 7,110,444, geared generally to advanced wireless solutions for communications networks.
Recent Posts
- Moratorium on State AI Regulation Scrapped in Senate Version of Trump’s ‘Big Beautiful Bill’
- Increasing Volume of Patent Deals Could Signal Bounce in Patent Marketplace | IPWatchdog Unleashed
- How the USPTO Could Make a Permanent After-Final Consideration Program Work
- Other Barks and Bites for Friday, June 27: EGC Says ‘NERO CHAMPAGNE’ Unduly Exploits Protected Designation of Origin; SCOTUS Seeks SG Views on Skinny Label Issues in Hikma; and a Big Week for Copyrights and AI
- PTAB Designates Informative Director Review Decision Vacating Institution of Two Petitions Challenging Same Claims