After dissenting APJ James Arpin was mysteriously and without explanation removed from the case, replaced by APJ Thomas Giannetti. Perhaps there is an innocent explanation for what happened here, but in the secretive, backroom world of the PTAB innocent explanations are becoming harder and harder to envision. And, frankly, given how the PTAB has run amok for so long the tribunal has lost any legitimate claim to the benefit of doubt. If there is nothing nefarious going on, then why is it that the patent owner always seems to be on the wrong end of these procedural irregularities? Why is it that the invisible hand of the PTAB always winds up on the side of the scale that takes patent rights away?
The post Parlor Tricks and Shell Games: How the Invisible Hand of the PTAB Supports Challengers appeared first on IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Patent Law.
Recent Posts
- SAG-AFTRA Says Fortnite’s Use of AI Instead of Actors Is Unfair
- Stewart Clarifies Application of Advanced Bionics, Orders New Briefing in Light of Rescinded Fintiv Memo
- Stewart Issues First Decisions on Discretionary Denial Under Interim Workload Management Process
- Senate IP Subcommittee Talks Legislative Fixes for China’s Threats to American Innovation Leadership
- Another Director Review Request Demonstrates Extent of PTAB Hubris