This week on IPWatchdog Unleashed we explore the age-old question about whether it is best to keep an innovation as a trade secret or if it makes sense to seek patent protection. And while this question is not new, it is a question that has been getting more attention in recent years as patents in the United States become weaker, which makes trade secrets increasingly look like a viable alternative for a host of different innovations in a variety of technology fields. “I have a pretty easy formula that I use to balance the patent versus the trade secret ,” Arash Behravesh said. “And that is, can it be reverse engineered? How much does it cost the competitor to reverse engineer it? And if we decide to keep it as a trade secret, how long will it be before somebody potentially discloses the information to the public?”
Recent Posts
- Patents vs. Trade Secrets: Do You Need a Patent, or is a Secret Good Enough? | IPWatchdog Unleashed
- No Infringement Intended: Can Tattoos Be Copyrighted? The Legal Battle Over Mike Tyson’s Iconic Ink
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, July 18: CAFC Finds Doctrine of Equivalents Barred by Prosecution Estoppel; Senators Grill Witnesses on AI and Fair Use; and UKIPO Begins Consultation on SEP Ratemaking
- CAFC Says Prosecution History Disclaimer Applies to Design Patents, Too
- Harrity & Harrity Seeks FT Patent Attorney / Agent in Electrical or Mechanical Technologies