The case law distinguishes between so-called “unpredictable arts” (e.g., the biological, chemical, and pharmaceutical arts) and “predictable arts” (e.g., electrical and mechanical arts) for purposes of Section 112 analysis for the very reason that one is considered “predictable” while the other, “unpredictable.”
Recent Posts
- The Personal Side of Patents: The Battle for Life-Saving Drugs | IPWatchdog Unleashed
- CAFC Majority Reverses PTAB Obviousness Ruling Over Dissent, But Rule 36 Issues Persist for CPC Patent
- Liability Risks Before the UPC: How U.S. Companies Need to Prepare
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, November 7: CJEU Action Against EU Commission Referred Over SEP Regulation; Ninth Circuit Affirms CoComelon Copyright Win; and C4IP Urges USTR to Address IP Concerns in USMCA Joint Review
- Mixed UK High Court Ruling Fails to Answer Fundamental Questions of AI Copyright Infringement
