Last month, we released our first ITC Intelligence Report. For the first time, we ranked ITC law firms and attorneys based on their performance and activity. Our research team analyzed the outcome of 308 ITC Section 337 Investigations, filed from January 1, 2014, through December 1, 2019. For all the terminated cases, we identified the outcome (e.g., violation, no violation, settlement, etc.). Then, depending on the outcome and win/loss of parties (i.e., complainants and respondents), we allocated points to each side, including the law firms and attorneys representing them.
Litigation
- CAFC Finds Claim for Delivery Notification System Abstract as Directed to a Longstanding Commercial Practice
- Non-Limiting Preamble Costs Cochlear at CAFC
- Federal Circuit Issues Several Rulings Defining Contours of Arthrex Decision
- (Not) Copyright Infringement: Is dbrand Infringing Nintendo’s IP?
- Supreme Court Reverses Second Circuit Approach to Defense Preclusion in Win for Lucky Brand
Recent Posts
- Defensive Publications: A Cost-Effective Tool to Supplement Your Patent Strategy
- A Stylized Word Mark in One Country May Be Too Simple and Common in Another
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, May 22: Copyright Office Issues Section 512 Safe Harbor Report, CAFC Denies Review of PTAB Institution Decision and Director Iancu on Possible Filing Deadline Extension
- CAFC Finds Claim for Delivery Notification System Abstract as Directed to a Longstanding Commercial Practice
- PTAB Institution Data Analysis Proves That Reforms Have Failed