The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently released new guidance to patent examiners on making obviousness rejections. The guidance focuses on post-KSR precedential jurisprudence from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Some of the guidance is fairly mundane, some of it is not. The purpose of this article is to propose a few responses one might use to counter rejections that apply certain problematic aspects of the new guidance.
Recent Posts
- Squires Emphasizes AI, Dubs Inherited Backlog ‘An Absolute Dumpster Fire’ and a ‘Betrayal’
 - Federal Circuit Clarifies Precedent on Pre-AIA Prior Art ‘By Another’
 - Squires Restores PTAB’s RPI Identification Requirement to Exacting Pre-SharkNinja Standard
 - Tariffs, Tech Wars, and Patent Turmoil: Navigating IP Strategy in a Rapidly Changing World | IPWatchdog Unleashed
 - Life Sciences Masters Panelists Lament Mounting Policy Uncertainty
 
