On February 19, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Return Mail Inc. v. United States Postal Service—one of two IP cases the Court heard that week. The courtroom for the Return Mail hearing was particularly full of press because it was Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s first hearing following a recent hiatus to have nodules on her lungs removed. The case asks whether the federal government constitutes a “person” for the purposes of instituting post grant review proceedings at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA). As reported earlier this week, the justices appeared to be dissatisfied with arguments from counsel on both sides—and skeptical that Congress had any view on the issue to begin with—but they arguably pushed back more against the government’s position. As always, IPWatchdog reached out to the patent bar for their take on the arguments. Like the questioning, the predictions were mixed and reveal no clear path, but a narrow holding in favor of Return Mail could be likely.
The post Return Mail Reaction: Patent Bar Sampling Narrowly Favors Finding for Petitioner appeared first on IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Patent Law.
- Patent Filings Roundup: Light Week Leading up to the Holidays Sees Record District Court Terminations
- Stars, Paparazzi, and the Puzzling Law of Copyrights
- B.E. Technology Dubs IPR Process a ‘Kafkaesque Nightmare’ in Mandamus Petition to CAFC
- Patent Infringement, Antitrust, and the Discovery Rule
- CAFC Vacates TTAB Finding of No Fraud on the USPTO, Citing Two Legal Errors
- Mechanisms, Governance, and Policy Impact of SEP Determination Approaches
- Now More Than Ever, IP Practitioners Need to Be Better Business Partners
- Live, Work and Play in a Legal Metaverse: Preparing for a New Online Existence
- The DOCX Transition: The USPTO Explains Why It’s Delaying the Fee for Non-DOCX Filings
- Rethinking Innovation with Michel, Iancu, and Watts