On Tuesday, February 19, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Return Mail Inc. v. United States Postal Service, a case that asks the nation’s highest court to determine whether the federal government constitutes a “person” for the purposes of instituting review proceedings at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA). Although the Supreme Court Justices appeared to be dissatisfied with arguments from counsel for either side, they arguably pushed back more against the USPS’ position. All Justices apart from Justice Clarence Thomas played an active role in questioning.
The post Return Mail v. USPS Oral Arguments: Both Sides Struggle in Robust Questioning at Supreme Court appeared first on IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Patent Law.
- Patent Filings Roundup: Light Week Leading up to the Holidays Sees Record District Court Terminations
- Stars, Paparazzi, and the Puzzling Law of Copyrights
- B.E. Technology Dubs IPR Process a ‘Kafkaesque Nightmare’ in Mandamus Petition to CAFC
- Patent Infringement, Antitrust, and the Discovery Rule
- CAFC Vacates TTAB Finding of No Fraud on the USPTO, Citing Two Legal Errors
- Mechanisms, Governance, and Policy Impact of SEP Determination Approaches
- Now More Than Ever, IP Practitioners Need to Be Better Business Partners
- Live, Work and Play in a Legal Metaverse: Preparing for a New Online Existence
- The DOCX Transition: The USPTO Explains Why It’s Delaying the Fee for Non-DOCX Filings
- Rethinking Innovation with Michel, Iancu, and Watts