Everybody loves an attorney or legal professional who delivers great legal or legal-related results, such as on-point advice or deliverables, favorable dispute or transaction outcomes, or high revenue growth. This is true in corporations, law firms, and solutions providers, where success largely depends upon the deft navigation of challenging situations, generation of revenue and profits, and the like. A common scenario occurs in many organizations: A colleague known for consistently delivering excellent tactical results is asked to begin managing other colleagues…. Such executives may assume that a colleague with legal or business proficiency naturally is an effective manager and leader. Alternatively, they may be uncertain how the colleague actually will perform, but think it’s worth a try in light of departmental needs. Unfortunately, meaningful vetting of individuals’ suitability and performance as managers and leaders sometimes is virtually nonexistent.
Recent Posts
- Liability Risks Before the UPC: How U.S. Companies Need to Prepare
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, November 7: CJEU Action Against EU Commission Referred Over SEP Regulation; Ninth Circuit Affirms CoComelon Copyright Win; and C4IP Urges USTR to Address IP Concerns in USMCA Joint Review
- Mixed UK High Court Ruling Fails to Answer Fundamental Questions of AI Copyright Infringement
- Professors Press SCOTUS to Affirm Copyright Protection for AI-Created Works
- Squires Emphasizes AI, Dubs Inherited Backlog ‘An Absolute Dumpster Fire’ and a ‘Betrayal’
