The Patent Trial and Appeal Board issued a decision denying the institution of an inter partes review (IPR) proceeding petitioned by home appliance developer SharkNinja. The decision leaves in place all claims of a patent asserted against SharkNinja in U.S. district court through a patent infringement case filed by appliance hose manufacturer Flexible Technologies. In denying SharkNinja’s petition for IPR, the PTAB panel of Administrative Patent Judges (APJs) found that implementing the hose found in Rohn to be a stretch hose as taught by Martin would render Rohn’s hose inoperable for its intended purpose… As for the Nagayoshi prior art reference, the PTAB sided with Flexible Technologies in finding that SharkNinja’s asserted combination is difficult to distinguish from a hindsight analysis…
The post SharkNinja Denied by PTAB, IPR Petition to Vacuum Cleaner Hose Patent Not Instituted appeared first on IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Patent Law.
Recent Posts
- Life Sciences Masters Panelists Lament Mounting Policy Uncertainty
- Interveners Left Out in the Cold: EPO’s G 2/24 Tightens Rules for Late Parties to Patent Challenges
- Massie to Reintroduce RALIA in Bid to Abolish PTAB
- Reddit Dubs Perplexity AI and Data Scraping Companies ‘Would-Be Bank Robbers’
- CAFC Gives Centripetal Another Shot at PTAB in Case Tied to APJ’s Alleged Bias