The Supreme Court has brazenly admitted it is not following Congress’ statutory instructions on patent eligibility in several cases. And it has carried out virtually none of the required statutory construction. It is judicial activism in the extreme… [I]t is hard to imagine a more unconstitutional statement than that discoveries cannot be patented when the statute the Court is applying states that any invention or discovery can be patented.
The post Sherry Knowles Scrutinizes an Activist Supreme Court and its Unconstitutional Approach to Patent Eligibility appeared first on IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Patent Law.
Sherry Knowles Scrutinizes an Activist Supreme Court and its Unconstitutional Approach to Patent Eligibility
No Comments
Patent
- Enablement
- Fee Shifting
- Litigation
- One Way or Another, Arthrex Promises to Put the PTAB on Trial
- Federal Circuit Reverses District Court Finding that ‘Check Data’ Patent is Abstract
- Netlist Wins ITC Exclusion Order: Will the USPTO Support It?
- The Problem of IPR Infringement in India’s Burgeoning Startup Ecosystem
- Other Barks & Bites, Friday, November 15: SCOTUS to Hear Booking.com Trademark Case, AG Barr Backs FCC Plan Against Huawei and ZTE, Copyright Office Eliminates Physical Material Submission Options
Recent Posts
- One Way or Another, Arthrex Promises to Put the PTAB on Trial
- Federal Circuit Reverses District Court Finding that ‘Check Data’ Patent is Abstract
- Netlist Wins ITC Exclusion Order: Will the USPTO Support It?
- The Problem of IPR Infringement in India’s Burgeoning Startup Ecosystem
- Other Barks & Bites, Friday, November 15: SCOTUS to Hear Booking.com Trademark Case, AG Barr Backs FCC Plan Against Huawei and ZTE, Copyright Office Eliminates Physical Material Submission Options