The Supreme Court has brazenly admitted it is not following Congress’ statutory instructions on patent eligibility in several cases. And it has carried out virtually none of the required statutory construction. It is judicial activism in the extreme… [I]t is hard to imagine a more unconstitutional statement than that discoveries cannot be patented when the statute the Court is applying states that any invention or discovery can be patented.
The post Sherry Knowles Scrutinizes an Activist Supreme Court and its Unconstitutional Approach to Patent Eligibility appeared first on IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Patent Law.
Sherry Knowles Scrutinizes an Activist Supreme Court and its Unconstitutional Approach to Patent Eligibility
No Comments
Patent
- Enablement
- Fee Shifting
- Litigation
- This Week in D.C.: NASA Deep Space Exploration, Small Business and Innovation, and Transportation Sustainability
- Chief Judge Paul Michel: Patent Reform Progress is Likely, But We Must Stay Focused On the Big Picture
- Take Steps to Deter the Spy in Your Business
- Don’t Ignore the Flashing Caution Lights in the Drug Pricing Debate
- Proving a Negative Claim Limitation: A Tale of Three Nonprecedential Cases
Recent Posts
- This Week in D.C.: NASA Deep Space Exploration, Small Business and Innovation, and Transportation Sustainability
- Chief Judge Paul Michel: Patent Reform Progress is Likely, But We Must Stay Focused On the Big Picture
- Take Steps to Deter the Spy in Your Business
- Russia: Court Removes Candidate from Ballot for Social Network Post
- Don’t Ignore the Flashing Caution Lights in the Drug Pricing Debate