The Supreme Court has brazenly admitted it is not following Congress’ statutory instructions on patent eligibility in several cases. And it has carried out virtually none of the required statutory construction. It is judicial activism in the extreme… [I]t is hard to imagine a more unconstitutional statement than that discoveries cannot be patented when the statute the Court is applying states that any invention or discovery can be patented.
The post Sherry Knowles Scrutinizes an Activist Supreme Court and its Unconstitutional Approach to Patent Eligibility appeared first on IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Patent Law.
Sherry Knowles Scrutinizes an Activist Supreme Court and its Unconstitutional Approach to Patent Eligibility
No Comments
Patent
- Enablement
- Fee Shifting
- Litigation
- Will SCOTUS Tell Bad Spaniels to Roll Over?
- DOJ Takes Key Step Toward Breaking Up Big Tech with Antitrust Complaint Against Google
- Practice Tips Following USPTO Guidance on Applicant Admitted Prior Art
- Federal Circuit Rejects St. Jude’s Challenge to Validity of Snyders’ Heart Valve Patent
- CAFC Affirms District Court Dismissal of Declaratory Judgment Under Doctrine of ‘Abstention’
Recent Posts
- Will SCOTUS Tell Bad Spaniels to Roll Over?
- DOJ Takes Key Step Toward Breaking Up Big Tech with Antitrust Complaint Against Google
- Practice Tips Following USPTO Guidance on Applicant Admitted Prior Art
- Federal Circuit Rejects St. Jude’s Challenge to Validity of Snyders’ Heart Valve Patent
- CAFC Affirms District Court Dismissal of Declaratory Judgment Under Doctrine of ‘Abstention’