On July 24, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed a decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas that a State asserting sovereign immunity could not be joined as an involuntary plaintiff, but dissented from the district court’s holding that the case could not proceed in the State’s absence. Gensetix, Inc. v. Baylor College of Medicine. Judges Newman and Taranto each wrote separately in partially dissenting from different aspects of the majority’s opinion.
Split CAFC Holds That a State Asserting Sovereign Immunity May Not Be Joined as Involuntary Plaintiff
No Comments
Litigation
- Ericsson Wins Anti-Interference Injunction Against Samsung in Texas FRAND Case
- Supreme Court Will Review Doctrine of Assignor Estoppel
- Patent Filings Roundup: IP Edge End-of-Year Filing Spree, WSOU Ends Year as Top Single-Entity Filer; AC Competitors Go to War Over a Cool Million
- Alice in 2020: Slashing Software Patents and Searching for Functional Language at the Federal Circuit (Part I)
- Inventors Have Their Say on PTAB at SCOTUS in Arthrex Amicus Briefs
Recent Posts
- Iancu Says Goodbye, Urges Commitment to ‘American Innovation Renaissance’
- Biden’s Opportunity to Protect American Innovation
- Washington Insiders Say Farewell to 2020 and Look Ahead to 2021
- Innovation Alliance Urges Biden Administration to Support Patent Rights
- From Agent to Examiner and Back Again: Practical Lessons Learned from Inside the USPTO