The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in a split decision today affirmed a district court ruling granting summary judgment to the U.S. government that the imposition of a Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program via the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) does not violate Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS) and Janssen Pharmaceuticals’ constitutional rights. Judge Hardiman dissented.
Recent Posts
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, November 7: CJEU Action Against EU Commission Referred Over SEP Regulation; Ninth Circuit Affirms CoComelon Copyright Win; and C4IP Urges USTR to Address IP Concerns in USMCA Joint Review
- Mixed UK High Court Ruling Fails to Answer Fundamental Questions of AI Copyright Infringement
- Professors Press SCOTUS to Affirm Copyright Protection for AI-Created Works
- Squires Emphasizes AI, Dubs Inherited Backlog ‘An Absolute Dumpster Fire’ and a ‘Betrayal’
- Federal Circuit Clarifies Precedent on Pre-AIA Prior Art ‘By Another’
