Ten years ago today, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down what at the time was one of the most important patent decisions in decades. It signaled a new era in patent law—not least of all because Bilski seemed to jumpstart the Supremes’ interest in patent cases. On this milestone anniversary, it’s worth reminding ourselves how we ended up where we are today. In the years since Bilski, the Court has decided Mayo v. Prometheus, Myriad and Alice. If the decision in State Street can be said to have marked the onset of a golden era in the patentability of software and business method patents, the decision in Bilski marked the beginning of the end, and Alice was its death knell, with its introduction of a two-step test for eligibility. Indeed, the unpredictability of application of 101 extends throughout all practice areas.
Ten Years From Bilski: The Beginning of the End, with No Improvement in Sight
No Comments
Patent
- Enablement
- Fee Shifting
- Litigation
- CAFC Affirms Ruling that Patent Owner Engaged in Abusive Litigation Tactics Against IBM, SAP and JP Morgan Chase
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, March 5: China Leads World in 2020 PCT Filings, Copyright Office Issues Rules on Music Modernization Act, and USIJ Urges President Biden to Pick Patent-Friendly USPTO Director
- Balancing Innovation and Competition: Thomas Jefferson’s View of Obviousness for Mechanical Inventions
- Design Patents: Under Utilized and Overlooked
- Deciding Where to Obtain International Patent Rights
Recent Posts
- CAFC Affirms Ruling that Patent Owner Engaged in Abusive Litigation Tactics Against IBM, SAP and JP Morgan Chase
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, March 5: China Leads World in 2020 PCT Filings, Copyright Office Issues Rules on Music Modernization Act, and USIJ Urges President Biden to Pick Patent-Friendly USPTO Director
- Balancing Innovation and Competition: Thomas Jefferson’s View of Obviousness for Mechanical Inventions
- Design Patents: Under Utilized and Overlooked
- Deciding Where to Obtain International Patent Rights