Ten years ago today, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down what at the time was one of the most important patent decisions in decades. It signaled a new era in patent law—not least of all because Bilski seemed to jumpstart the Supremes’ interest in patent cases. On this milestone anniversary, it’s worth reminding ourselves how we ended up where we are today. In the years since Bilski, the Court has decided Mayo v. Prometheus, Myriad and Alice. If the decision in State Street can be said to have marked the onset of a golden era in the patentability of software and business method patents, the decision in Bilski marked the beginning of the end, and Alice was its death knell, with its introduction of a two-step test for eligibility. Indeed, the unpredictability of application of 101 extends throughout all practice areas.
Recent Posts
- Patent Blame Game: Are 70% of U.S. Patents Really Defective? | IPWatchdog Unleashed
- Stewart Rejects Motorola’s Argument that Director Reviews Applied New Fintiv Guidance Retroactively
- Perlmutter Says Trump’s Attempt to Remove Her as Register is ‘Blatantly Unlawful’ and Has No Effect
- Brazil: Senate Advances Discussions on Bill to Regulate AI Use
- ITC Asks Federal Circuit to Redo Lashify Ruling on Domestic Industry Interpretation