While federal court practice has certain exceptions, such as taxing costs, awarding attorney’s fees, or reducing to writing an earlier oral decision without altering its substance, (Price, 139 S. Ct. at 1537–38, 204 L. Ed. 2d 238.) a Section 285 motion is a consideration of the entirety of the case and its proper consideration is before a mandate is returned on the patent infringement issue.
Recent Posts
- Other Barks and Bites for Friday, June 27: EGC Says ‘NERO CHAMPAGNE’ Unduly Exploits Protected Designation of Origin; SCOTUS Seeks SG Views on Skinny Label Issues in Hikma; and a Big Week for Copyrights and AI
- PTAB Designates Informative Director Review Decision Vacating Institution of Two Petitions Challenging Same Claims
- Stewart Grants Discretionary Denial Due to Patent Being Dismissed From Litigation
- U.S. Government’s Intervention in Patent Case Signals Good News for Patent Owners Seeking Injunctions
- Gaming Patent Litigation on Both Sides of the ‘v’ | IPWatchdog Unleashed