While federal court practice has certain exceptions, such as taxing costs, awarding attorney’s fees, or reducing to writing an earlier oral decision without altering its substance, (Price, 139 S. Ct. at 1537–38, 204 L. Ed. 2d 238.) a Section 285 motion is a consideration of the entirety of the case and its proper consideration is before a mandate is returned on the patent infringement issue.
Recent Posts
- PTAB Designates as Informative Stewart Decision on Discretion to Institute in Context of Parallel District Court Litigation
- Judge Hughes Again Calls Out CAFC’s Overly Rigid Article III Analysis for Pharmaceutical Cases
- Coke Stewart’s Recent Show Cause Order Offers Hope for Addressing Serial Patent Challenges
- The USPTO Should Reintroduce the AFCP Program—Now
- What Fintiv v. PayPal Means for Software and AI Patent Practice