While federal court practice has certain exceptions, such as taxing costs, awarding attorney’s fees, or reducing to writing an earlier oral decision without altering its substance, (Price, 139 S. Ct. at 1537–38, 204 L. Ed. 2d 238.) a Section 285 motion is a consideration of the entirety of the case and its proper consideration is before a mandate is returned on the patent infringement issue.
Recent Posts
- Mixed UK High Court Ruling Fails to Answer Fundamental Questions of AI Copyright Infringement
- Professors Press SCOTUS to Affirm Copyright Protection for AI-Created Works
- Squires Emphasizes AI, Dubs Inherited Backlog ‘An Absolute Dumpster Fire’ and a ‘Betrayal’
- Federal Circuit Clarifies Precedent on Pre-AIA Prior Art ‘By Another’
- Squires Restores PTAB’s RPI Identification Requirement to Exacting Pre-SharkNinja Standard
