While federal court practice has certain exceptions, such as taxing costs, awarding attorney’s fees, or reducing to writing an earlier oral decision without altering its substance, (Price, 139 S. Ct. at 1537–38, 204 L. Ed. 2d 238.) a Section 285 motion is a consideration of the entirety of the case and its proper consideration is before a mandate is returned on the patent infringement issue.
Recent Posts
- The Return of a Mandate on Patent Infringement Precludes Further Consideration of Issues Actually Decided
- CAFC Affirms TTAB Ruling that FIREBALL is Not Generic but Competitor’s Mark Won’t Confuse
- John Squires Becomes Official Nominee to Head USPTO
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, March 7: Lashify Wins ITC Appeal on Economic Prong Analysis; CAFC Says Apple Did Not Violate Discovery Obligations at PTAB; and ParkerVision Files Reply Brief on Rule 36 Appeal at SCOTUS
- Rio Tinto is Seeking an IP Counsel Innovation & Technology