While federal court practice has certain exceptions, such as taxing costs, awarding attorney’s fees, or reducing to writing an earlier oral decision without altering its substance, (Price, 139 S. Ct. at 1537–38, 204 L. Ed. 2d 238.) a Section 285 motion is a consideration of the entirety of the case and its proper consideration is before a mandate is returned on the patent infringement issue.
Recent Posts
- Foreign Price Controls: A Risk to U.S. Medical Innovation and Patient Access
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, July 11: EGC Affirms Annulment of Rubik’s Cube Marks; Sysco Trade Secret Case Dismissal Affirmed by Fourth Circuit; and EU Advocate General Finds Member States Can Impose Measures to Protect News Content on Meta Platforms
- EU Publishes Code of Practice as Deadline for AI Act’s Provisions on General-Purpose AI Models Nears
- Will the Federal Circuit Finally Follow Supreme Court Holdings on the Unavailability of the Laches Defense?
- CAFC Upholds Win for Janssen on Patent for Antipsychotic Med Dosing Regimen