While the changes to the Trial Practice Guide begin to move the rules in the right direction, more is needed before post-grant proceedings will be accepted as neutral to all parties. The PTAB should endeavor to adopt the time-honored burdens, presumptions and procedures used in the district courts for trying patent cases whenever reasonably possible. Petitioners should be required to prove that the art upon which they rely is not cumulative to that previously before the USPTO, a patent owner’s Preliminary Response presenting evidence raising genuine issues of material fact should be treated as it would be if presented in opposition to a summary judgment motion brought in the courts, and the presiding panel should determine witness credibility by hearing testimony and cross examination live.
The post The Updated PTAB Trial Practice Guide – Not Quite There Yet appeared first on IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Patent Law.
Recent Posts
- Other Barks and Bites for Friday, December 6: GAO Releases Third-Party Litigation Funding Report; PQA Must Identify Members in VLSI Patent Litigation; CAFC Issues Two Precedential Decisions
- Newman Makes Another Bid to Reverse Suspension from CAFC
- CAFC Delivers Win for Meta in Precedential Decision
- USPTO Officially Withdraws Terminal Disclaimer Proposal
- Judge Newman’s Suspension by the CAFC Has Marred Public Faith in the Federal Judiciary