A European Patent Office (EPO) opposition is often the first line of defense for a party seeking to invalidate a European patent. Oppositions must be filed within nine months of the patent’s grant, and they offer a centralized way to revoke or limit the patent in all designated states. With the Unified Patent Ccourt (UPC) now providing a parallel central revocation mechanism (with no deadline) for UPC member states, it was inevitable that some patents would face both an EPO opposition and a UPC revocation/infringement action at the same time. The interplay between these proceedings has quickly become a critical issue, raising questions of stays, inconsistent outcomes, and tactical timing. Case law from 2024–2025 illustrates how the UPC and parties are managing double-tracked disputes.
Recent Posts
- CAFC Affirms TTAB’s Genericness Test for Color Marks
- AI and the Law: How Companies Can Navigate IP Risk and Seize Opportunity | IPWatchdog Unleashed
- Press Play on American IP: AI Can’t Scratch the Soundtrack to World IP Day
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, April 25: World IP Day 2025 Celebrates Musicians; Texas A&M to Lead Center for Advanced Aviation Technologies; and Tenth Circuit Affirms Specialty Metals Trade Secret Dismissal
- Judges Seem Frustrated with Judicial Council Arguments in Newman v. Moore Case