Earlier today, the Precedential Opinion Panel (POP) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) overruled the institution decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) in GoPro, Inc. v. 360Heros, Inc., IPR2018-01754, which related to U.S. Patent No. 9,152,019. Substantively, with respect to the determination that any federal pleading filed will trigger the running of the time-bar clock of Section 315(b), the POP explained that GoPro’s arguments would require terms not present in the statute to be read into the statute (i.e., “complaint” to be read as “proper complaint”). Further, the POP explained that GoPro failed to demonstrate that a complaint filed without proper Article III standing is considered a legal nullity for the purpose of Section 315(b)’s time bar.
Recent Posts
- How Commercial General Liability Policies’ ‘Coverage B’ Can Help Mitigate IP Losses
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, October 18: OpenAI Outlines Defensive Patent Strategy; Microsoft Files Opposition in Lawsuit Alleging Illegal Buyer’s Cartel for Patent Licenses; Moderna Under Fire for Spikevax Vaccine Tech
- NPEs Have No Obligation to Mark Under the Statute—and that Should Extend to an NPE’s Settlement Licensees
- SCOTUS Nixes McRO Eligibility Argument in Denying Yet Another Section 101 Cert Petition
- China’s Administrative Patent Infringement Procedure: A Litigation Tool Worth Patent Holders’ Notice