This past Wednesday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a precedential decision affirming a district court holding that the software term “payment handler” was a “nonce” term for functional language that followed it, thereby invoking 35 U.S.C. § 112, sixth paragraph, as mean-plus-function claiming. The Federal Circuit then held that the corresponding patent specifications did not recite sufficient structure that corresponded to the claimed function, making the “payment handler” element indefinite and therefore invalidating the associated patents.
Recent Posts
- What Fintiv v. PayPal Means for Software and AI Patent Practice
- Despite Tweaks, PREVAIL 2025 Would Still Transform the PTAB
- Patent Eligibility Reform Returns to the Hill: PERA 2025 Explained
- PayPal, Apple Succeed in Scrapping Fintiv’s Patent Claims at CAFC
- CAFC Affirms TTAB’s Genericness Test for Color Marks