Under Rule VII of the Rules of the Senate, bills can only move forward by unanimous consent. Consequently, a single senator may place a “hold” on a bill to keep it from passing. In principle, the rule exists to ensure that any senator may suspend the legislative process in order to review and research a proposal, particularly in cases where his or her state has a keen interest. In practice, of course, senate holds are wielded like one-man filibusters that often mask ulterior motives. Holds are meant to be contemplative pause buttons, not kill switches. Since last September, Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) has maintained a hold on the small-claim copyright provision known as the CASE Act. This bill would create a voluntary, small-claim tribunal conducted by a newly created Copyright Claims Board (CCB) at the U.S. Copyright Office.
Wyden Attempts to Stall CASE Act: Senate Holds Are Not Supposed to Be Dead Ends
No Comments
Copyright
- Computer Law
- Fair Use
- First Sale Doctrine
- Washington Insiders Say Farewell to 2020 and Look Ahead to 2021
- Europe’s Top Five (Non-Patent) IP Developments of 2020
- Senator Tillis Releases Draft Bill to Modernize the Digital Millennium Copyright Act
- ‘We Want Action’: Rightsholder Reps Address Platforms in IP Subcommittee Hearing, as DMCA Reform Draft Looms
- Tillis Report Sums Up Senate IP Subcommittee’s Work on U.S. IP and Innovation
Recent Posts
- Washington Insiders Say Farewell to 2020 and Look Ahead to 2021
- Innovation Alliance Urges Biden Administration to Support Patent Rights
- From Agent to Examiner and Back Again: Practical Lessons Learned from Inside the USPTO
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, January 15: Copyright Office Issues Final Rule on Unmatched Musical Works Under MMA, $1 Billion Copyright Verdict Against Cox Communications Upheld, USPTO Publishes Report on China IP Filings
- USPTO Report Puts Chinese Innovation Growth in Context