To those of us who breathe intellectual property and innovation, it sounds so obvious to say that consumers benefit greatly from the dynamic competition inventions and IP bring forth: new products, technologies and industrial sectors. However, many who breathe antitrust hold a different perspective — it presumes a patent confers market power, that commercialization amounts to anticompetitive conduct and that the right to exclude is equivalent to monopolization by incumbent players in a static market. Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust Makan Delrahim, who left the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) with the changeover of administrations, bridged this gulf. Delrahim achieved this due to his background as both patent attorney and antitrust lawyer. Delrahim offered a framework he calls the New Madison Approach. The New Madison Approach advanced through the division’s amicus program.
Recent Posts
- Four Factors to Consider When Deciding Whether to Use Trade Secrets
- The CRISPR Battle Through the Lens of International Patent Harmonization
- The Case for Using Filing Dates Instead of Expiration Dates to Determine Obviousness-Type Double Patenting (Part I)
- Other Barks and Bites for Friday, May 3: FTC Adds Ozempic and 300 Drugs to FDA’s Orange Book; Eight Major Newspapers Sue OpenAI, Microsoft for Copyright Infringement
- CAFC Reverses Dismissal of Declaratory Judgment Suit Linked to Amazon’s APEX Program