Earlier today, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in a standard essential patent (SEP) appeal involving Ericsson and TCL Communication Technology—a closely watched case that many hoped would produce some case law relating to what constitutes a FRAND (fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory) offer of a licensing royalty rate relative to SEPs. See TCL Communication Technology Holdings Ltd. V. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, No. 2018-1363, 2018-1732 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 5, 2019). Because the Federal Circuit determined that Ericsson was deprived of its constitutional right to a jury trial, the district court decision was reversed, and the case remanded for further proceedings. However, the question of whether Ericsson’s offers to TCL qualified as FRAND offers were not reached by the Federal Circuit.
Litigation
- Dyk Splits from CAFC Panel on Application of Collateral Estoppel to Inter Partes Reexaminations
- CAFC Reverses In-Part, Vacates In-Part PTAB Finding of Patentability for Skin Cancer Detection Device
- UK Judge Backs Meghan Markle over Leaked Letter
- Federal Circuit Says Amgen’s Repatha® Patent Claims Require ‘Undue Experimentation’ to Practice
- Should We Require Human Inventorship? Submit Your Amicus Brief by March
Recent Posts
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, February 26: Tillis Tells Biden to Oppose Anti-IP Efforts at WTO; China Patent Commercialization Jumps 2.5x During 13th Five-Year Plan; Federal Circuit Finds U.S. Navy Liable for Copyright Infringement
- Sarah Boone: the ‘Ironing Table’, Perfected
- How to Safeguard AI Technology: Patents versus Trade Secrets
- Dyk Splits from CAFC Panel on Application of Collateral Estoppel to Inter Partes Reexaminations
- CAFC Reverses In-Part, Vacates In-Part PTAB Finding of Patentability for Skin Cancer Detection Device