The written description requirement is really the backbone of the quid pro quo between the public and the patent applicant. In exchange for information about an invention, society is willing to grant the applicant a patent, which conveys exclusive rights for a limited period of time to what is claimed, not described. But the description provided in the specification must demonstration that the applicant really has an invention in the first place and what the boundaries of that invention are—this is the written description requirement in lay terms.
Recent Posts
- Federal Circuit Upholds PTAB Win for Patent to Detect Genetic Disorders
- CAFC Says Patent Claims Need Not Explicitly Disclose Material Benefits for Trademark Functionality Doctrine
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, January 3: Judge Stoll Faults CAFC Majority for Fact Finding, Darrell Issa to Chair House IP Subcommittee Again, and China to Subsidize Smartphone Sales
- Legislative Developments in Patents: Prospects for the PREVAIL and RESTORE Acts and PERA in 2025
- The Year Ahead: Here’s What Our Readers Will Have on their Radar for 2025