On Tuesday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in SIPCO, LLC v. Emerson Electric Co. affirmed a determination of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) that the claims at issue were obvious in view of the prior art in an appeal that was returned to the CAFC on remand from the U.S. Supreme Court. In particular, the CAFC concluded that, according to the recent Supreme Court decision in Thryv, Inc. v. Click-to-Call Technologies, LP, “§ 324(e) prohibits judicial review of SIPCO’s challenge because it is nothing more than a contention that the agency should have refused to institute [covered business method] CBM review.” The CAFC also affirmed the PTAB’s determination that the claims at issue were obvious in view of the prior art.
Federal Circuit Considers CBM Review Under Thryv on Remand from SCOTUS
No Comments
Litigation
- The New Copyright Small Claims Board Presents Problems for Copyright Owners and Small Businesses
- Dyk Splits from CAFC Panel on Application of Collateral Estoppel to Inter Partes Reexaminations
- CAFC Reverses In-Part, Vacates In-Part PTAB Finding of Patentability for Skin Cancer Detection Device
- UK Judge Backs Meghan Markle over Leaked Letter
- Federal Circuit Says Amgen’s Repatha® Patent Claims Require ‘Undue Experimentation’ to Practice
Recent Posts
- Balancing Innovation and Competition: Thomas Jefferson’s View of Obviousness for Mechanical Inventions
- Design Patents: Under Utilized and Overlooked
- Deciding Where to Obtain International Patent Rights
- The New Copyright Small Claims Board Presents Problems for Copyright Owners and Small Businesses
- From Home Security to VoIP: Honoring Black Women Inventors of the Last Half-Century