Earlier today, in cxLoyalty, Inc. v. Maritz Holdings, Inc., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed-in-part, reversed-in-part and dismissed-in-part a decision of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO’s) Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) in which the CAFC doubled down on its past contention that the USPTO’s Subject Matter Eligibility Guidance is not binding on the court’s analysis. The panel included Chief Judge Prost and Judges Lourie and Hughes. The opinion was authored by Prost.
Recent Posts
- Neurosurgeon Backing Judge Newman Defends Report Against CAFC Committee Criticisms
- SCOTUS Denies ParkerVision, Island IP and Other IP Petitioners Further Review
- mRNA Patent Wars Update: The Plot Thickens with Key Rulings Expected in 2025
- IP News: Barks & Bites for Friday, March 21 | IPWatchdog
- The Outlook for SEPs in 2025: Anti-Suit Injunctions, DOJ Policy and GenAI