On Tuesday, November 27th, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) issued a redacted version of a decision to institute an inter partes review (IPR) proceeding petitioned by Unified Patents to challenge the validity of patent claims that have been asserted in district court against at least one of Unified’s subscribing members. The PTAB panel of administrative patent judges (APJs) decided to institute the IPR despite the patent owners’ assertion that the petition should be denied because Unified didn’t identify all real parties in interest (RPIs) including members of Unified’s Content Zone. The charade that Unified is the only real party in interest and simply acts in uncoordinated ways and not at the behest of those who pay for them to challenge patents continues, at least at the PTAB.
The post PTAB Institutes IPR, Finds Unified Patents is Sole Real Party in Interest appeared first on IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Patent Law.
PTAB Institutes IPR, Finds Unified Patents is Sole Real Party in Interest
No Comments
Patent
- Enablement
- Fee Shifting
- Litigation
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, August 7: USPTO Increases Fees for Patent Filings and AIA Trials, State AGs Ask HHS to March-In on Remdesivir, CAFC Denies American Axle Rehearing
- No, You Can’t March in On Remdesivir
- Google v. Oracle Perspective: Google’s Android ‘Cheat Code’ was to Copy Oracle’s Code
- Illumina v. Ariosa: En Banc Rehearing Denied, Illumina Patents Again Upheld on Rehearing
- CAFC Evenly Splits on En Banc Rehearing of American Axle’s Driveshaft Patent
Recent Posts
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, August 7: USPTO Increases Fees for Patent Filings and AIA Trials, State AGs Ask HHS to March-In on Remdesivir, CAFC Denies American Axle Rehearing
- No, You Can’t March in On Remdesivir
- Google v. Oracle Perspective: Google’s Android ‘Cheat Code’ was to Copy Oracle’s Code
- Illumina v. Ariosa: En Banc Rehearing Denied, Illumina Patents Again Upheld on Rehearing
- CAFC Evenly Splits on En Banc Rehearing of American Axle’s Driveshaft Patent