Why does the patent venue statute shield accused infringers from patent litigations in states where they have registered to do business as foreign corporations? Isn’t that part of the quid pro-quo of doing business in the district? The general venue statute does not provide such a shield; so why provide it in patent cases? Maybe the time has come to kill the patent venue statute entirely because without it, patent cases would fall under the general venue statute and be treated like other corporate litigations.
Recent Posts
- Other Barks and Bites for Friday, April 26: World Intellectual Property Day Celebrated Around the Globe; China Tops List for AI Patents Granted; EPO Releases Cleantech Study on World IP Day
- Celebrating World IP Day: Is the Innovative Future Sustainable?
- The Rise of IP Lawsuits When Posting Images: How to Navigate and Avoid Copyright Infringement Issues
- The SEP Couch: Lyse Brillouet on Managing SEPs and Open Standards
- Unveiling The Untapped Potential of Brazil’s Solar Energy Market