Most commentators agree that Google v. Oracle is the most important copyright decision of the last 25 years (since Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music). But what if the Court got it wrong? The Court has not always done well with issues of technology (the Sony v. Universal “Betamax” case being an exception), and the majority decision in Google v. Oracle appears to be more of the same. For many reasons, the powerful dissent from Justices Thomas and Alito may be the better opinion.
The View from the Court’s 2 Live Crew: Examining the Thomas/Alito Dissent in Google v. Oracle
No Comments
Copyright
- Computer Law
- Fair Use
- First Sale Doctrine
- The Common Thread of Innovation Ecosystems: Securing Ownership to Guarantee Creation
- Sweden: Patent and Market Court Declares Classic Works Quotable Even under Offensive Circumstances
- Open for Business: How Intellectual Property Supports Our Entrepreneurs
- The View from the Court’s 2 Live Crew: Examining the Thomas/Alito Dissent in Google v. Oracle
- The Upshot of Google v. Oracle: An Absurd Ruling Will Lead to Absurd Results
Recent Posts
- Tai Says United States Will Back India-South Africa Proposal to Waive IP Rights Under TRIPS
- Looking Back at Soon-to-Be Chief Judge Moore’s Major CAFC Opinions
- Can Process Confer Structure to Distinguish the Art after Biogen v. EMD Serono?
- The Common Thread of Innovation Ecosystems: Securing Ownership to Guarantee Creation
- Other Barks & Bites for Friday, April 30: Brazil Senate Passes COVID-19 Patent Waiver Bill, Cornyn Mulls Expanding ITC’s Section 337 Authority; China Says It Leads World in 6G Patent Applications